Saturday, 10 September 2016 10:55
Lisa Lucas is the head
of the National Book Foundation, and one of her goals is to make reading fun again.Now, if you're reading
this—which means you're on LitLovers and thus a devoted reader, you're going, "Wha...???" YOU think reading is already fun.But some people
don't, hard as it is to imagine—and we all KNOW people like that.My husband
, really bright guy (math-&-physics type bright), doesn't read much. He finds dense blocks of text daunting—to the point of off-putting. Issues with concentration, maybe?Another reason
—and you've heard this one—"I don't have time." Well, here's Lisa Lucas on that:
If you read for an hour every single day, you’re reading seven hours a week, which is enough to bang through a decent amount of material if you do that...for 52 weeks.
about why people don't enjoying reading:
That last one
♦ Some people have trouble quieting their minds. They can't sit still; they're the doers & fixers.
♦ I think I lack the imagination, am too impatient, and don't want to THINK about my entertainment.
♦ TV, films, music, and the digital world provide easier methods of entertainment.
♦ Reading takes too much work and takes too long. We have to convert symbols into words and then process the result.
♦ Reading fiction is a waste of useful time.
♦ Inveterate non-readers probably had to read Moby-Dick in the 7th grade and never got over it.
—suffering through Moby-Dick
in 7th grade—oh, boy! I remember that. And this is where Lisa Lucas believes she might make a difference.
The way we TALK ABOUT LITERATURE CAN STOP CONVERSATION even before it starts. If we can reframe how we talk about connecting readers with literature, and how we want to market that concept of NOT MAKING IT FEEL IT'S SOME KIND OF CHORE, I think we’ll find change.
Amen, Lisa Lucas
From New York Times
. Changing minds, and habits, is hard work but a laudable goal. Best of luck to all of you at the National Book Foundation.
Monday, 25 July 2016 15:02
I've said this
before, but it bears repeating—we readers are a lucky bunch to have OTHER people willing to write novels for us. I certainly can't do it.Read what
author Amos Oz has to say about just how arduous crafting a novel is.
Wait...that's the hard part?
It is like reconstructing the whole of Paris from Lego bricks. It’s about three-quarters-of-a-million small decisions. It’s not about who will live and who will die and who will go to bed with whom. Those are the easy ones.
It’s about choosing adjectives and adverbs and punctuation. These are molecular decisions that you have to take and nobody will appreciate.... That is the business of three-quarters-of-a-million decisions.
PUNCTUATION? Nah, that's nowhere near the hard part. When someone says to me (and people have surely said it to you), "You should write a book," MY JAW DROPS in dumb wonderment. Just how smart do people think I am? (I'm not.) Even more to the point, just HOW EASY do they think writing novels is? (It isn't.)A BAZILLION Legos
—not a million—go into novel writing. Here's just some of the stuff authors have to think about—stuff we take for granted but then get ALL TETCHY over if authors get it wrong:
- WHO will tell the story, whose voice (or voices) will be used? (It better be a convincing.)
- WHAT information will be withheld? When will it be revealed? Who will reveal it, and how?
- IS the dialog believable—is it the way people really speak? (Not so easy.)
- HOW much research is needed to establish setting—location and era.
- HOW will the characters be shaped; how much depth will they be given; what will make them life-like and compelling?
- HOW will the plot be structured—what's the arc of the story?
- WHAT underlying concerns, themes, or ideas will suffuse the book? What big questions does the author want to explore?
- WHAT about all the literary stuff—imagery, symbolism / metaphor, irony, and allusions—which gives the story richness and resonance?
Writing is a hard-knock life. Too hard for the likes of me. AND YET, it's remarkable, isn't it, that with the rise of web-based self-publishing, lots and lots of people are heading to the key board to try their hand(s) at writing books.
Bless them one and all. They are BRAVE SOULS, brave souls indeed!
Saturday, 04 June 2016 11:18
...could be right out of Anne Fadiman's Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader
—a terrific collection of essays about a lifetime spent in the pursuit of books: reading, writing, and collecting them. (The author is best known for The Spirit Catches You, You Fall Down
, 1997.)Here's what happened:
Having sublet her apartment, Fadiman returns home from a lengthy trip. It turns out her subleasers are two design-oriented guys who thought they'd do her a favor and spiff the place up a bit.So what did they do?
They rearranged her bookshelves. Nothing practical mind you, like genre, subject, or author name...no-no-no. That would be PROSE-AYE-ICK. They reorganized the books by—you guessed it—COLOR. And Fadiman? Amused...and horrified.Well, I've got
some pretty spiffy bookshelves myself, built by Victorians 120 years ago. Here's what mine look like.A beautiful mess
. Books are crammed in topsy-turvy and arranged willy-nilly, with no claim to the niceties of decor or organization. It's all DVDs, old Disney videos, kids crayons, cookbooks and wine glasses (off to the left), along side Shakespeare (my grandfather's 1920s set).Bookshelves
are deeply personal things. This lovely mess has meaning: it reflects a sort of "what-you-see-is what-you-get" approach to our lives. More importantly, the mess contains a good bit of family history, giving us pleasure just to look at it.So how personal
are your bookshelves—what do they say about you? Finally (and we've talked about this before), how much longer will bookshelves grace our homes? What will we lose when everything is digitalized. And, yes, I ♥
Thursday, 12 May 2016 14:20
are taking a hit these days—in the myriad books written and millions of readers propelling them to the top of the charts. The girls
I'm referring to are those fictional sociopaths, Amy (Gone Girl
), Jodi (Silent Wife
), Rachel (Girl on the Train
), and most recently Lacey and Dex (Girls on Fire)
. *Then there's
Peggy Orenstein's nonfiction Girls & Sex
about the troubling state of affairs as young women negotiate their way in the brave new world of hook-up sex.Do notice
, btw, the frequent use of "girl" in the titles. A "girl" is a young female lacking the stature—and substance—of a mature woman. Like what's up with that?Marketers
are surely taking a title cue from Steig Larsson's spectacularly successful "Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" series. But Larsson's heroine, Lisbeth Salander, while outlandish, is a cut above the new "girls." Amy, Jodi, Rachel, and friends are downright ... frighteningly ... pathological.Yet these books
are cresting the bestseller charts...because we readers are scooping them up.So what wave
are these books riding? Something's up—some anxiety or unease within women, or about women, which these hugely popular books are playing into. What an interesting topic for book clubs to take up!My 20-something
says it's about time: Males have long been cast as psychopaths, and women are just catching up—a sign of equity in her eyes. Well, maybe.Except
that these books are coming out fast and furiously—one after another—and hitting the charts in a HUGE way. It's puzzling. For some reason, we can't get enough of GIRLS GONE BAD. Why is that? (Also take a look at a previous post: Gone Girl Marriages—Creeping Us Out
* JUST RELEASED . . .
Add to our list the newest girls-gone-bad book, The Girls by Emma Cline, based on the Charles Manson cult murders. These bad girls got the publishing world so worked up that author Cline walked away with a cool $2 MILLION. And this is her first book!
Tuesday, 12 April 2016 09:57
Written by Cheryl Jones* for LitLovers
We all know
reading to youngsters is important. But aside from the pure joy we feel, it's easy to overlook why it's so important.Take a look
at these highlights from a study conducted by the Melbourne (Australia) Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.
Reading to Young Children
------A Head Start in Life
--------—Ages 4 to 5—
♦ Reading to this age group has a significant positive effect later in life—on reading (language & literacy) and cognitive skills (numeracy & cognition).
♦ Children read to more frequently achieve higher scores on the [Australian] National Assessment Program for both Reading and Numeracy for ages 8 to 9.
♦These differences in reading and cognitive skills are not related to the child's family background or home environment.
Authored by: G. Kalb and J.C. van Ours, 2012
matters. Based on work by Glenn Dorman, a child development specialist, young children’s eyes are still developing, which is why lettering in children's books is so large (small letter aren't helpful). Good rule of thumb: the younger the child, the bigger the letters.Frequency
matters, too. According to the Melbourne study (above), reading to children 3-5 days a week advances reading skills by six months. Reading 6-7 days a week can advance their skills by a full year!One reason
early reading is so beneficial is that it strengthens vocabulary and thinking skills—enabling children to ask questions when they're presented with difficult new material. The greater the vocabulary, the easier it is to ask for help.Other studies
over the years have shown that when children fall behind in the lower grades they often stay behind in the upper grades. Worse, they're at risk of dropping out later on.A love of reading
is a precious gift to give a child. And as every person who visits LitLovers knows, learning doesn't end with high school or college—which is why you
happen to be here, reading this, right now. Starting early
with reading not only gives kids an extra boost when they're young—it turns into an advantage for life. It can be a key factor in keeping them engaged in school, as well as keeping them in school. And, importantly, it can inspire in them a life-long love of reading—just like you.*Cheryl Jones is a blogger and a free-lance witer. Visit her blog here.
Thursday, 31 March 2016 09:08
In case you
hadn't noticed, the novel seems to be getting longer and longer, some clocking in at 700-800+ pages. In a gag
news article we wrote a while back, we riffed on the idea of authors taking performance enhancing drugs
, enabling them to pound out longer and longer sentences, leading to "stupefyingly longer" books.Now someone's
pushing back. Although publishers have pressed him "to write longer books," Welsh author Cynan Jones praises the short novel. He points to The Old Man and the Sea, They Shoot Horses Don't They?, Animal Farm
, even Gatsby
(though Fitzgerald worried it was too short). Here's Cynan Jones on the subject:
I've never met a reader who doesn't like short novels.... For me, the opportunity to sit somewhere for two hours and read a book from start to finish—to submerge myself in it—is a thrilling experience. A short novel makes a straightforward demand: give me this time.
Readers don't buy
books by the the pound, Jones points out. And publishers should get over their obsession with longer works. "The only thing to be taken into account should be the impact a piece of writing has," says Jones. Amen, we say.
Cynan Jones is the author of The Dig and, more recently, Everything I Found on the Beach. The full article can be read in Publisher's Weekly
Tuesday, 17 November 2015 10:03
We love books, and we love movies. And we REALLY love movies that come from books.
Book clubs say, over and over, that a favorite club activity is attending movies based on books—especially if the book is a club selection.
That's why LitLovers has decided to partner with Screen Thoughts.
SCREEN THOUGHTS takes the book-to-movie connection a step beyond. They read the book . . . see the movie . . . then create a 20-minute podcast about their impressions.
Hollister and O'Toole, the voices behind the mic, are smart, knowledgeable, and engaging. They review the films and ask the questions we care about:
♦ Is the film true to the book?
♦ Are the actors right for the book's characters?
♦ Do you prefer the book to film . . . or film to book?
Click HERE for Screen Thoughts podcasts—or go the top of the LitLovers homepage. Listen on your own . . . or listen as a group in your book club—they're sure to spark discussion. Who's right—Hollister or O'Toole? Both? Neither?
Each month you'll find a new book-to-movie podcast. So be sure to listen in.
Page 1 of 17