Originals (Grant)

Discussion Questions
We'll add the publisher's questions if and when they're made available. In the meantime use these LitLovers talking points to kick off a discussion for Originality...then take off on your own:

1. Adam Grant proposes that all of us have creatuve, even original, ideas even if we don't consider ourselves as nonconformists. Where would you place yourself on the spectrum of non-creative→creative? Think of some creative ideas you've had about improvements in the way you approach things, perhaps changes to routine tasks you perform day to day—or anything, really.

2. Follow-up to Question 1: What, according to Grant, is the difference between creativity and originality? Where would you place yourself on that spectrum: creative→original?

3. If Grant is right, that many originals never act on their ideas, what holds them back? Any personal experience in that area?

4. Grant asserts that sexism can subvert originality: women, say at work, are often dismissed, even penalized, for originality while men are often rewarded for it. Have you ever seen or had first-hand experience with this bias in action? Is there a way out of it?

5. What kind of organization or institutional structures promote originality according to Grant?

6. Talk about Grant's view of middle managers. Why does he see those individuals as less creative than others on the upper or lower rungs of management?

7. How can we spur creativity or originality in our children? How might say, approval, from teachers or parents hinder its development?

8. What internet browser do you use, and what does it say about you?

9. Grant provides various examples of original individuals. Whose story do you find most interesting or most impressive?

(Questions by LitLovers. Please feel free to use them, online or off, with attribution. Thanks.)

top of page (summary)